Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. Schmider
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1962No. 6873PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
This is a suit by a real estate broker for his commission in a situation where the final purchase was not consummated,’ it having been determined in Bellamah v. Schmider, 1961, 68 N.M. 247, 360 P.2d 656, that the contract could not be specifically enforced because of a deficient tender of the down-payment. The defendant seller appeals from the granting of judgment in favor of the plaintiff broker.
The only real question concerns the claimed lack of good faith on the part of the plaintiff in failing to disclose the identity of the prospective purchaser, the defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Totah Drilling Company v. AbrahamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Latta v. HarveyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Davis v. HartleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hales v. Van CleaveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Yrisarri v. WallisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Sanchez v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Southwest Motel Brokers, Inc. v. Alamo Hotels, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Carol Rickert & Associates v. LawNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.