Legal Opinion

Hales v. Van Cleave

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1967No. 34PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Judge.

This is a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of New Mexico. It is unquestioned that plaintiff sustained compen-sable injuries on December 22, 1964, while employed by defendant, Van Cleave; that he was entitled to the maximum compensation benefits of $38.00 per week during the period of his total disability; that he received weekly benefits at this rate from defendant, Mountain States Mutual Casualty-Company, from the date of his injury to February 28, 1966, for a total period of sixty-two weeks and total compensation of $2,356.00; and that he was furnished medical…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Wilson v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Tsosie v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Varney v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Samora v. BradfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. State v. ManloveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Gallegos v. Duke City Lumber Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Meyers v. Western Auto & CNA InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API