Hales v. Van Cleave
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
This is a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of New Mexico. It is unquestioned that plaintiff sustained compen-sable injuries on December 22, 1964, while employed by defendant, Van Cleave; that he was entitled to the maximum compensation benefits of $38.00 per week during the period of his total disability; that he received weekly benefits at this rate from defendant, Mountain States Mutual Casualty-Company, from the date of his injury to February 28, 1966, for a total period of sixty-two weeks and total compensation of $2,356.00; and that he was furnished medical…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Wilson v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Tsosie v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Varney v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Samora v. BradfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. ManloveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gallegos v. Duke City Lumber Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Meyers v. Western Auto & CNA InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.