Legal Opinion
Latta v. Harvey
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1960No. 6556PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
Motion for rehearing having been filed, we have reached the conclusion that the former opinion entered in this case should be withdrawn and that the following should he substituted therefor.
Opinion
Defendant Bokum appeals from a judgment against him on a suit for the value of drilling work and for the furnishing of standby equipment and services.
Two questions are raised by the appellant, (1) failure of appellee to comply with the contractors’ licensing statute, and (2) refusal of the trial court to reopen the case for further testimony.
Latta was hired by Bokum’s agent and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sullivan v. . DunhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Arias v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Sundt v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Mendoza v. Gallup Southwestern Coal Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mahoney v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Fox v. DoakNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Morris v. MerchantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Reule Sun Corp. v. VallesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Santa Fe Custom Shutters & Doors, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.