Legal Opinion

Portland Sand & Gravel Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1930No. Appeals, 26, 27 and 28PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

These appeals are based on three judgments entered on cases stated in which the facts, except as to the kind of materials furnished by plaintiffs and the extent of liability, are the same, and the decision in one controls the finding as to the others. All may therefore be considered in a single opinion, since the only difference is in the amount recoverable, if any. From the agreed facts, it appeared that the Globe Indemnity Company was surety on a bond given by the Juniata Company as principal in connection lyitli the construction of certain highways in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Philadelphia v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Philadelphia v. Harry C. Nichols Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. H. H. Robertson Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Merion Township School District v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Concrete Products Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. City of Pgh. v. Commercial Casualty Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Mock, Trustee v. BechtelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Borough of Castle Shannon v. CollingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Borough of Somerset v. BarberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API