Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
This action was originally brought by the Crescent-Portland Cement Co. in its own name against defendant surety company on a bond given to the County of Greene. Later, plaintiff, following a suggestion of the court below, amended the statement of claim so that the action was brought in the name of Greene County to the use of the real plaintiff. The claim arose out of a contract made by the county with Samuel Gamble Company for the improvement of State Highway Route No. 109. The contractor failed to pay the use-plaintiff, a materialman, and this action was brought…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Philadelphia v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Davidson, Exrx. v. BrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Blymire v. BoistleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
- Brill v. BrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Hind v. HoldshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Byram Lumber & Supply Co. v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- McClelland v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wilmington Housing Authority v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1946
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.