Borough of Somerset v. Barber
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
The action below was assumpsit for the use of a material-man to recover on a bond given the Borough of Somerset by a contractor and his surety.
Barber, one of the defendants, entered into a contract with the borough to do certain street paving and in compliance with the contract furnished a bond upon which the other defendant, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, was surety. The condition of the bond is as follows:
“Now, therefore, The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounden principal as contractor shall in all respects comply with the terms of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- H. H. Robertson Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- School District v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Patterson v. New Eagle BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Portland Sand & Gravel Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Pgh. v. Commercial Casualty Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933