Mock, Trustee v. Bechtel
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
In order to arrive at a correct decision in this matter it is necessary to keep in mind the particular facts of this case which distinguish it from the authorities relied on by the appellant.
Bechtel & Walter, a partnership, entered into a contract with Monroe Township for the building of a bridge over Sidling Hill Creek for the sum of $3,-387.73. The contract itself contained no clause, covenant or provision for the protection of laborers or material men furnishing work or materials in the erection of the bridge; nor was there any statutory requirement that it should do…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Lesley v. KiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Philadelphia v. Harry C. Nichols Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Cox v. New England Equitable Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Philadelphia v. McLindenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sundheim v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Lancaster Co. Nat. Bank's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- In Re L. H. Duncan & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- American Surety Co. v. KunkleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. State Public School Building Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.