Legal Opinion

Mock, Trustee v. Bechtel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1930No. Appeal 384PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

In order to arrive at a correct decision in this matter it is necessary to keep in mind the particular facts of this case which distinguish it from the authorities relied on by the appellant.

Bechtel & Walter, a partnership, entered into a contract with Monroe Township for the building of a bridge over Sidling Hill Creek for the sum of $3,-387.73. The contract itself contained no clause, covenant or provision for the protection of laborers or material men furnishing work or materials in the erection of the bridge; nor was there any statutory requirement that it should do…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Lesley v. KiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Philadelphia v. Harry C. Nichols Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Cox v. New England Equitable Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  5. Philadelphia v. McLindenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sundheim v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Lancaster Co. Nat. Bank's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. In Re L. H. Duncan & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. American Surety Co. v. KunkleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. State Public School Building Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API