Richard G. King v. The California Company, Gulf Refining Company, Placid Oil Company, Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company and Sam Gross
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Circuit Judge.
The question involved here is whether a partial summary judgment entered by the court below is subject to appeal under applicable statutes. A skeleton outline of the facts upon which the summary judg“ent+ entf<!d is nec®««y t° “ un^erstanding of the issue presented on the motion to dismiss,
_ Appellant King, as plaintiff, sued four companies and one individual, appel*ees bere, ^or damages alleged to have acc™ed to him from what he charged to be illegal, wilful and negligent actions by or on behalf of the appellees incident to the drilling and operating of ten oil wells…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Lewis v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Tye v. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Pierce v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Coy E. Kirtland v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Columbia Gulf Transmission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Reams v. Tulsa Cable Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Albatross Shipping Corporation v. Robert R. Stewart, Libelant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- David B. Bush v. United Benefit Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.