Brazil v. Dell Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Defendant Dell Inc. (“Dell”) moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) with prejudice and to strike plaintiffs’ class action allegations. Plaintiffs Chad Brazil (“Brazil”) and Steven Seick (“Seick”) oppose Dell’s motion. For the reasons below, the court finds that Texas law applies to the plaintiffs’ claims and grants Dell’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ statutory causes of action. The court also grants Dell’s motion to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Carideo v. Dell, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- In re AutoZone, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Fagerstrom v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Walter v. Hughes Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Haley v. TalentWise, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.