Legal Opinion
Fagerstrom v. Amazon.com, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 21, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-96-BAS-DHBPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CYNTHIA BASHANT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Andrea Fagerstrom (“Fager-strom”) and Allen Wiseley (‘Wiseley”) filed this putative class action against Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) alleging California state law claims related to false advertising and unfair business practices. (ECF No. 1, Attach. 3) The suit was originally filed in state court and removed to this Court pursuant to the Class Action. Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). '(EOF No. 1.) Amazon now moves to compel arbitration and dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims based on the"…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind v. Container Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- David Johnson v. Keybank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Pilar Domer v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Acklie v. Greater Omaha Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Keena v. Groupon, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.