Walter v. Hughes Communications, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Tina Walter (‘Walter”), Christopher Bayless (“Bayless”) and Eric Schumacher (“Schumacher”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have brought this purported class action lawsuit against their internet provider for supplying internet services that, they allege, are significantly slower than advertised. See Am. Consolidated Class Action Compl. (“Am. Compl”), Docket No. 18. The internet provider, comprised of Hughes Communications, Inc., and Hughes Network Systems, LLC (collectively,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Benjamin Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In re Scotts EZ Seed LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Herron v. Best Buy Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Roling v. E TRADE SECURITIES, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In re Conagra Foods Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.