Legal Opinion

Walter v. Hughes Communications, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 26, 2010No. Case No. 09-2136 SCPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Tina Walter (‘Walter”), Christopher Bayless (“Bayless”) and Eric Schumacher (“Schumacher”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have brought this purported class action lawsuit against their internet provider for supplying internet services that, they allege, are significantly slower than advertised. See Am. Consolidated Class Action Compl. (“Am. Compl”), Docket No. 18. The internet provider, comprised of Hughes Communications, Inc., and Hughes Network Systems, LLC (collectively,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Benjamin Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. In re Scotts EZ Seed LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Herron v. Best Buy Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
  4. Roling v. E TRADE SECURITIES, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. In re Conagra Foods Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API