Legal Opinion

AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1934No. 6330, 6331PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Two causes of aetion were incorporated in one suit, begun below by the A. 0. Smith Corporation. The first was a patent infringement suit alleging infringement of Smith reissue patent, No. 16,865, for an “oil refining still and method of making the same by electric welding.” The second was based upon wrongful and fraudulent appropriation of certain secret processes in the field of electric arc welding alleged to be owned by the plaintiff, and useful in the fabrication of oil pressure vessels of the kind described in the patent. The second causo of action was, on the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  3. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  5. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  4. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. K & G Tool & Service Co. v. G G Fishing Tool ServiceTexas Supreme Court · 1958

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API