Legal Opinion

Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1993No. C8-93-747PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

The district court denied appellant Dynamic Air’s motion for a temporary injunction to enforce confidentiality, nonsolicitation, and nonemployment covenants on the ground that the covenants lacked a territorial limit. Dynamic Air contends the trial court erred in determining that Minnesota law prohibits enforcement of restrictive covenants lacking territorial limits. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

Respondent Jon Bloch worked as an intern for Dynamic Air, Inc., in 1989 while attending college. After earning a B.S. degree in industrial technology, he was hired by Dynamic Air in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Wisconsin, Inc. v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Bess v. BothmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Larx Co. Inc. v. NicolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. County Materials Corp. v. Allan Block Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance v. Roger SchwiegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Midwest Sign & Screen Printing Supply Co. v. Robert Dalpe & Laird Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  5. Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. TimmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API