Legal Opinion

People v. Nolan

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1904No. Crim. No. 1116PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

The defendant was informed against jointly with Michael Nolan, John Davis, and Bernard White-law for the crime of robbery, and, on a separate trial, was convicted and adjudged to suffer imprisonment in the state prison for the term of eight years. She appeals from the judgment and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

It is urged on this appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. There was no claim that the appellant was present at the commission of the crime, the theory of the prosecution being simply that, not being present, she advised and encouraged its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ReggelSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. People v. RozelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. People v. TrieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. BurdgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. SaffellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API