People v. Burdg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The appellants, Clifford Burdg and Mollie Trau, were charged jointly with having murdered the latter’s husband, Philip Trau, and upon trial the jury found Burdg guilty of manslaughter and Mrs. Trau guilty of second degree murder. The appeals, which are taken from the judgments of conviction, are separately presented.
Insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdicts is one of the grounds urged for reversal by both appellants. As will hereinafter appear, however, the evidence is sharply conflicting, and such being the case the conclusions reached thereon by the jury are controlling. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. ErnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. RozelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. GrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.