Legal Opinion

Bagley v. Bagley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The plaintiff is the widow and the defendants are the sons and executors of the will of William Bagley, Sr., deceased. The complaint contains the following allegations:

“1. That on or about the first day of January, 1917, and while the above-mentioned William Bagley, now deceased, was alive, plaintiff entered into a contract with the said William Bagley (sometimes known and described as ‘William Bagley, Sr.’) by the terms of which it was agreed that as soon as the parties thereto could arrange their affairs to that end this plaintiff was to enter into the service of said William Bagley as his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woods v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Larsen v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bohanan v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Hoskins v. Powder Land & Irr. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Mathews v. TobiasOregon Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Traver v. NaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Branchflower v. MasseyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Stoop v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Holder v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API