Legal Opinion
In Re Hardwick
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 2004No. 03-BG-191PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
On February 5, 2003, the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspended respondent John C. Hardwick, Jr. by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland. Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Hardwick, 372 Md. 689, 815 A.2d 815 (2003). 1 In an affidavit attached to the petition for indefinite suspension by consent, which respondent filed jointly with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, he acknowledged that sufficient evidence could be produced t/o sustain certain allegations of misconduct made by Maryland Bar Counsel. Among those allegations were charges that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re BladesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re MannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In RE McLAUGHLINDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re FarrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re RosenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009