Legal Opinion

In Re Slattery

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 2001No. 98-BG-1500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In a petition filed in May 1998, Maryland Bar Counsel alleged that respondent James M. Slattery, in three separate real estate settlements, withheld funds for the recording of the deed and the purchase of title insurance, and then failed to record the deeds or purchase title insurance. The petition also alleged that respondent ignored repeated requests from his client to correct these deficiencies, never accounted for the funds, failed to maintain complete escrow account records, and failed to provide Maryland Bar Counsel with the requested records. The petition for disciplinary action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re BladesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SlatteryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re HardwickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. In re Harris-SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. In re MassagliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API