Legal Opinion

In RE McLAUGHLIN

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2009No. 09-BG-788Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On further consideration of the certified copy of the order issued by the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspending respondent, see Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Donald Paul McLaughlin, 409 Md. 304, 974 A.2d 315 (2009), this court’s July 22, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, and directing respondent to show cause why he should not be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, with a fitness requirement, and that he should not be eligible to petition for reinstatement until…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re MeislerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. In Re HardwickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API