Legal Opinion

Berry v. Koehler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1962No. 8813PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*174McFADDEN, Justice.

Plaintiffs, as appellants and cross-respondents (herein referred to as appellants), are the same individuals as the appellants in the case of Berry v. Summers, 76 Idaho 446, 283 P.2d 1093, which held unconstitutional the provisions of S.L.1953, Ch. 105, § 1. Defendants, respondents and cross-appellants (herein referred to as respondents), at the time of filing this appeal, were incumbents of their respective offices.

S.L.1957, Ch. 81, § 1, the subject of this action is as follows:

“Section 1. That Section 54-901 Idaho Code be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
“…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Rim View Trout Co. v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. O'BRYANIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API