Legal Opinion

Rim View Trout Co. v. Higginson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1992No. 18785PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

In this water rights case we are called upon to interpret and apply the provisions of I.C. § 67-4308. We agree with the district court that the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous, and we therefore affirm the order of the district court reversing the decision of Idaho Department of Water Resources.

I

Niagara Springs is located in the Snake River Canyon between the towns of Twin Falls and Bliss. In 1971 the legislature passed a bill, now codified at I.C. § 67-4308, that permits the Idaho Department of Parks & Recreation (IDPR) to appropriate a portion of the waters of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Leliefeld v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Local 1494 of the International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Berry v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. YzaguirreIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API