Legal Opinion

Roscoe Moss Co. v. Roggero

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1966No. Civ. 685PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

Defendants appeal from what the trial court termed a “summary judgment,” which was granted following an expression of viewpoints by counsel for the several parties at a pretrial conference, in total disregard of the procedural requirements for securing such a judgment as established by section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff sued the defendants for $1,424.59 as the alleged reasonable market value of materials for a well, including easing, a starter, and shoe, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien in that basic amount on the real property of defendants. In their answer, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Price v. McComishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Witaschek v. WitaschekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Ackerman v. AckermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  5. May v. MayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API