Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 2005No. H028333PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUFFY, J.

As an encouragement to the open communication essential to successful settlement discussions, the Evidence Code, and in particular Evidence Code section 1119 1 makes inadmissible any statements, writings, or other communications made in connection with mediation. We consider here whether this broad mediation confidentiality statute may be used by a settling party as a shield to prevent the admission of a purported settlement document signed at the conclusion of mediation in subsequent proceedings to enforce the settlement.

Plaintiff Darren Stewart sued as a result of personal…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Cox v. Ocean View Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Bruni v. DidionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Provost v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Cassel v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Rodriguez v. OtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API