Legal Opinion

Witaschek v. Witaschek

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1942No. Civ. No. 13760PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

56 Cal.App.2d 277 (1942)

FRIEDA WITASCHEK, Respondent,

v.

PAUL WITASCHEK, Appellant.

Civ. No. 13760.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Dec. 21, 1942.

Stephen Monteleone for Appellant.

Raymond E. Parr for Respondent.

GOULD, J. pro tem.

Defendant appeals from a judgment granting to his wife an interlocutory decree of divorce and awarding to her certain property, permanent alimony, attorney's fees and costs.

As to the divorce itself it is obvious after examining the pleadings, the testimony placed before the trial court and the findings and judgment based thereon, that an appellate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Estate of GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ivy v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Ivy v. Pacific Automobile Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API