Legal Opinion

Atwater v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1989No. 88-220PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

This case presents two difficult issues arising from the cancellation of petitioner Larry 0. Atwater’s automobile liability insurance policy. On the merits, the question is whether an insurer is relieved from the requirement that it provide the insured with thirty days notice of the cancellation of a policy, see D.C.Code § 35-2109 (1988), when the insurance is financed by a premium finance company. Before reaching this issue, however, we must determine whether a District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA) administrative law judge,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. North Haven Board of Education v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Brannan v. StarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Thorsten P. Sundberg v. TTR Realty, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Calvetti v. AntcliffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API