Legal Opinion
State v. Oanes
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1996No. C1-95-1064PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
After a bench trial, Rachel Janel Oanes was convicted of prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.324, subd. 3(1). On appeal, Oanes argues: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support her conviction; (2) the trial court erred by failing to consider the defense of entrapment; and (3) the trial court improperly relied on evidence earlier excluded as irrelevant.
FACTS
On July 6, 1994, an undercover police officer from the Minneapolis Police Department entered “Nite-Lites,” a reputed house of prostitution. Oanes greeted the officer at the door, informing him the cost was…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. GrilliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Juster Bros. Inc. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996