Legal Opinion

State v. Oanes

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1996No. C1-95-1064Published

1Opinion of the Court

543 N.W.2d 658 (1996)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Rachel Janel OANES, Appellant.

No. C1-95-1064.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 6, 1996.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, St. Paul, Surell Brady, Minneapolis City Attorney, Laura A. Yonts, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Samuel M. Vaught, Gregory M. Pennella, St. Paul, for appellant.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and RANDALL and SHORT, JJ.

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

After a bench trial, Rachel Janel Oanes was convicted of prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.324, subd. 3(1). On appeal, Oanes…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. United States v. Fred MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. GrilliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API