Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 23, 1998No. 97-1810PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Mary Gaye Schmidt, challenges her conviction for prostitution, in violation of Iowa Code section 725.1 (1995). She argues there is insufficient evidence she made an offer for the sale of her services as a partner in a sex act or accepted such an offer. Additionally, she asserts the State must prove there was an affirmative agreement to sustain a conviction for prostitution. We reject her arguments an'd affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

On May 12, 1997, John Hutcheson, an undercover officer in the vice unit, was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. AbbasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. State v. BoleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. State v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Lp v. LfWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State of Iowa v. Nathaniel Quentin KnightCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API