State v. Whitley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant Dennis L. Whitley seeks review of his conviction and sentence for fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct, arguing that the evidence was not sufficient to prove force or coercion, as required by MinmStat. § 609.345, subd. 1(c) (2002). Appellant further argues that although he waived his right to a jury trial on the criminal conviction, his due process rights were violated when the district court enhanced his sentence without informing him of his right to have a jury determine whether he committed a predatory offense or without obtaining a knowing and intelligent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- O'MEARA v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BorboaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. BorboaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. BoehlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005