Legal Opinion

State v. Whitley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 2004No. A03-725PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Dennis L. Whitley seeks review of his conviction and sentence for fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct, arguing that the evidence was not sufficient to prove force or coercion, as required by MinmStat. § 609.345, subd. 1(c) (2002). Appellant further argues that although he waived his right to a jury trial on the criminal conviction, his due process rights were violated when the district court enhanced his sentence without informing him of his right to have a jury determine whether he committed a predatory offense or without obtaining a knowing and intelligent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. O'MEARA v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BorboaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. State v. BorboaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. BoehlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API