Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Franklin & Marshall College

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

David S. Edwards (Edwards) appeals from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Franklin & Marshall College (F & M) in a personal injury action. Edwards’ sole claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in determining that the Peculiar Risk Doctrine, an exception to the rule that an employer of an independent contractor is not liable for injuries caused by the negligence of the contractor or its servants, is not applicable. Finding no merit to this contention, we affirm.

The facts were summarized by the trial court as follows:

[Edwards], a construction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. JulianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. McDonough v. United States Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Emery v. Leavesly McCollumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Donnelly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Motter v. Meadows Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Dunkle v. Middleburg Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API