Legal Opinion

Emery v. Leavesly McCollum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1999PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Stephen H. Emery and Star Emery, appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Bechtel Construction, Inc. (“Bechtel”) and Gilberton Power Company (“Gilberton”). We affirm.

¶2 The Emerys filed negligence actions against Bechtel and Gilberton, among others. 1 The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Bechtel on the ground that Bechtel was Stephen Emery’s statutory employer. The court held that Gilberton was not hable for the acts or omissions of its general contractor, Bechtel, and granted summary judgment in favor of Gilberton…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Skipworth v. Lead Industries Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Kingston Coal Co. v. Felton Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Braun v. Target Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Beil v. Telesis Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API