Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1987No. 1205 and 1385PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*51BECK, Judge:

Appellant Angelo Ortiz was a laborer in the employ of A-V Brick Corporation (“A-V”). He was injured on the job when a fourteen-foot high scaffold on which he was working collapsed. He was on the scaffold erecting masonry walls for a warehouse owned by appellee Ra-El Development Corporation (“Ra-El”). Ra-El contracted for the work with Arnko Builders, Inc. (“Arnko”) as the general contractor. Arnko in return subcontracted with Ortiz’s employer A-V.

Ortiz brought suit against Ra-El and Arnko, claiming that A-V was negligent in failing to assemble the scaffolding in accordance with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. JulianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Hargrove v. Frommeyer & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Emery v. Leavesly McCollumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Lorah v. Luppold Roofing Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Strain v. FerroniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API