Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1998No. 2023 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) that denied SEPTA’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

In 1990, SEPTA awarded a general contract to Tony DePaul & Son (Depaul) for the renovation of elevated rail lines known as the Railworks Project. 1 DePaul then entered into a subcontract with Muratone Company, Inc. (Muratone) to do the painting and sandblasting work. 2 Before Muratone began its sandblasting operations on the Railworks Project, The Philadelphia Electric…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Finn v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. JulianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Rooney v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Boyle v. Municipal Authority of Westmoreland CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Dunkle v. Middleburg Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Blocker v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API