Legal Opinion

Lomax v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 22, 1985No. CR 84-195PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Gary Lomax was found guilty by a jury of aggravated robbery and séntenced to a term of 20 years imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. He subsequently filed a petition pursuant toA.R.Cr.P. Rule 37 to vacate the sentence, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The petition was denied without a hearing and appellant brings this appeal.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to be relieved and a brief stating there is no merit to the appeal. Appellant was notified of his right to file a pro se brief within 30…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rawls v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Knappenberger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Melvin Shoemate v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Shuffield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API