Lomax v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Appellant Gary Lomax was found guilty by a jury of aggravated robbery and séntenced to a term of 20 years imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. He subsequently filed a petition pursuant toA.R.Cr.P. Rule 37 to vacate the sentence, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The petition was denied without a hearing and appellant brings this appeal.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to be relieved and a brief stating there is no merit to the appeal. Appellant was notified of his right to file a pro se brief within 30…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rawls v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Knappenberger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- Melvin Shoemate v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Shuffield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.