Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 1992No. CR 91-134PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant was charged with first degree murder, pleaded not guilty, was given a jury trial, and was found guilty of second degree murder. He retained new counsel and filed a motion for a new trial in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.4, which has been superseded by Rule 37.1. The trial court denied his motion for a new trial. He appeals from both the judgment of conviction and the denial of the motion for a new trial. There is no merit in either appeal.

I

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gillie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Finley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API