Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1996No. CR 95-1227PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. Brown, Justice.

Appellant Reginald Johnson appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. He urges two points in support of his appeal: (1) trial counsel was ineffective in fading to call witnesses to impeach the testimony of a primary state witness, Charlie Farmer; and (2) trial counsel prejudiced his case by failing to communicate plea options to him. We hold that the appeal is meritless, and we affirm.

Reginald Johnson was charged with first-degree murder in connection with the shooting death of Bruce Hatchett on February…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Missildine v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Dumond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Tisdale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. DillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Wertz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Chenowith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API