Legal Opinion

Rawls v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 1979No. CR78-121PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

On March 23, 1978, appellant appeared in open court with his appointed counsel (public defender) and entered a plea of nolo contendere. He executed a plea statement wherein he affirmed his understanding of the nature of the charges against him, the possible penalties, and that he waived the right to a jury trial. The record shows the court adequately informed him of the full consequences of such plea and, in fact, stated it amounted to a plea of guilty.

At no time did appellant allege he was innocent. In fact, he apparently freely admitted he had committed rape and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shipman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Frederick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Orman v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Johninson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Malone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Scalco v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API