Legal Opinion

Krantz v. Bt Visual Images, L.L.C

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 2001No. Nos. A085999, A087341, A089575PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEPULVEDA, J.

These are three appeals from a final judgment and satellite orders entered by the San Francisco County Superior Court in a suit for damages for breach of contract, interference with prospective economic advantage, and defamation. We are asked by plaintiff-appellant to rule the sustention of a demurrer to the amended complaint without leave to amend was erroneous as a matter of law, the rulings granting defendants partial summary judgment/summary adjudication improperly shifted the burden of proof, and a series of discovery scrimmages were wrongly refereed by a court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Cansino v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  3. Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  5. Desaigoudar v. MeyercordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API