Krantz v. Bt Visual Images, L.L.C
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
These are three appeals from a final judgment and satellite orders entered by the San Francisco County Superior Court in a suit for damages for breach of contract, interference with prospective economic advantage, and defamation. We are asked by plaintiff-appellant to rule the sustention of a demurrer to the amended complaint without leave to amend was erroneous as a matter of law, the rulings granting defendants partial summary judgment/summary adjudication improperly shifted the burden of proof, and a series of discovery scrimmages were wrongly refereed by a court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Cansino v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Desaigoudar v. MeyercordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.