Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 12, 2011No. C 09-03596 CRBPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND AND GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
This is an employment compensation putative class action “aris[ing, in Plaintiffs’ view] out of [Hewlett-Packard’s (“HP”)] acknowledged failures over the past several years to record timely and accurately the sales of its equipment and services; and to calculate properly, and pay timely, the commissions and bonuses ... owed to HP’s sales representatives.... ” Third Am. Compl. (dkt. 69) ¶ 1.
Several Motions are presently before the Court. First, Plaintiffs move for leave to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Andrade v. Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Fresno Unified School District v. K.U.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Calop Business Systems, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.