Legal Opinion

State v. Baca

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1997No. 23343PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Justice.

1. This appeal is before the Court pursuant to our writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. Defendant Magdaleno Baca contends that: (1) he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not request a jury instruction on the single criminal intent doctrine; and (2) insufficient evidence was adduced at trial to support his forgery conviction. We conclude that the facts of this case would not support or warrant an instruction to the jury on the single criminal intent doctrine; thus, the ineffective assistance of counsel claim is without merit.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BrooksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. PedroncelliNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. OrgainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. CollinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. GarvinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API