State v. Baca
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
1. This appeal is before the Court pursuant to our writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. Defendant Magdaleno Baca contends that: (1) he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not request a jury instruction on the single criminal intent doctrine; and (2) insufficient evidence was adduced at trial to support his forgery conviction. We conclude that the facts of this case would not support or warrant an instruction to the jury on the single criminal intent doctrine; thus, the ineffective assistance of counsel claim is without merit.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BrooksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PedroncelliNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. OrgainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. CollinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. GarvinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.