State v. Orgain
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
Defendant appeals her convictions for multiple counts of forgery and conspiracy to commit forgery. On appeal, she contends that (1) there is insufficient evidence to support the convictions for a variety of reasons; and (2) the number of convictions violates the prohibition against double jeopardy, again for a variety of reasons. We address only the reasons necessary to our disposition. Defendant raised two additional issues in the docketing statement, which have not been briefed and are therefore deemed abandoned. See State v. Fish, 102 N.M. 775, 777, 701 P.2d 374, 376…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Herron v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SandersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- State v. NietoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.