Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 2009No. 28,138PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals his convictions for trafficking a controlled substance (cocaine) and conspiracy to traffic cocaine within a drug-free school zone. We address whether there was sufficient evidence to support his conspiracy conviction and whether he was denied his right to a speedy trial. To resolve this appeal, we address a question we declined to reach in State v. Montes, 2007-NMCA-083, 142 N.M. 221, 164 P.3d 102, which is whether the term “knowingly” in NMSA 1978, § 30-31-20(C) (1990) (amended 2006), requires the State to prove knowledge of the drug-free school zone…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Ramon SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. FierroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.