Legal Opinion

Twin City Brief Printing Co. v. Review Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 15, 1918No. 20,726PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Eeview Publishing Company, Clarence E. Wilkinson, Fred L. Hayward and Emil E. Johnson, to restrain defendants from usjng the name of Eeview Publishing Company in Minneapolis, and from transacting the business of printing briefs, paper books and other general job printing under that name.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Eeview Publishing Company, Clarence E. Wilkinson, Fred L. Hayward and Emil E. Johnson, to restrain defendants from usjng the name of Eeview Publishing Company in Minneapolis, and from transacting the business of printing briefs, paper books and other general job printing under that name. The separate answers of defendants expressly denied that either defendant Wilkinson or Henry A. Flint or Edwin Irle ever conveyed or assigned to plaintiff the right to use the name of defendant corporation or that defendant corporation ever agreed that…

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, O. J.

Defendant Review Publishing Company was organized as a corporation under the laws of the state sometime in the year 1897, with its established place of business and headquarters in the city of St. Paul. It was so organized by defendant Wilkinson, EL A. Flint, and one Gardner, who joined their capital and labors for the purposes of the enterprise. The business of the company was and always has been job printing, with special attention to the printing of records and briefs for use in this and some of the Federal courts. The company established a prosperous and lucrative business,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . DeenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Slater v. . SlaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Myers v. Kalamazoo Buggy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Peer v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Haugen v. SundsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monson v. ArcandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Trigo Hermanos, Inc. v. Sobrino de Izquierdo, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  3. Jarvaise Academy of Beauty Culture v. St. Paul Institute of Cosmetology, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Gracey v. MaddinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  5. Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API