Legal Opinion

Monson v. Arcand

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1953No. 35,885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying Ms alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial in a personal injury action.

Defendant, Hector Arcand, and his brother, Clement Arcand, were partners engaged in masonry and cement contracting under the name “Arcand Brothers.” They employed about 15 blocklayers, cement finishers, carpenters, and laborers, including plaintiff, Wendell A. Monson, who was employed as a construction laborer. The Central Surety and Insurance Corporation issued a standard workmen’s compensation policy covering these…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Gleason v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Reed v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Brollier v. Van AlstineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Swiezynski v. CivielloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Hamman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967
  5. Abbott v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API