Legal Opinion

Myers v. Kalamazoo Buggy Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1884PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) Injunction bill.

1Per curiam

In this case, without at this time presenting our views at length, we deem it proper to say that in our opinion the defendants, in adopting the corporate name they chose, and in any steps taken by them to draw to the new establishment the customers of the old, were guilty of acts calculated to destroy or impair the good-will sold to the complainant, and therefore not to be justified. We also think there is evidence in the case showing unfair advantage taken of mistakes made by persons who came or were brought into communication with the defendants when they supposed they were dealing with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beal v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Slater v. . SlaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills Co. v. EagleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  4. Williams v. FarrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. President Suspender Co. v. MacwilliamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API