Legal Opinion

Jarvaise Academy of Beauty Culture v. St. Paul Institute of Cosmetology, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 1931No. 28,362PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The action is one to enjoin the defendants from using.the name “DeGuile” or “Madame DeGuile” in connection with the operation of a school and shop in St. Paul for training persons desiring to engage in the beauty shop business. There is also in the complaint a claim for recovery of damages for the alleged unauthorized use of these names. But it is conceded that no actual damages were proved, and no claim is now made on that ground.

The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of defendants. The only…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Russia Cement Co. v. LePageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Hoxie v. ChaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Piper v. Laughman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1889
  4. Seabrook v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  5. Wright Restaurant Co. v. Seattle Restaurant Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Mid-List Press v. NoraDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  3. Stout v. LawsHawaii Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Farmers' Educational & Cooperative Union of America v. Iowa Farmers UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1957
  5. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API