Legal Opinion

Gracey v. Maddin

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 25, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

Defendants have appealed from the Chancellor’s granting of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and entering judgment prohibiting defendants’ use of a former law partner’s name “in any form or fashion.”

The material facts, which are undisputed, are as follows:

Hugh C. Gracey, Sr. was a widely respected lawyer who practiced law in various partnerships for more than thirty-five years in Davidson County, Tennessee.

On 23 April 1974, Mr. Gracey entered into a general partnership Agreement with John K. Maddin, Robert H. Cowan, Richard D. Bird, Michael Miller, and Don R.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Slack v. SuddothTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Twin City Brief Printing Co. v. Review Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BumpassUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996
  2. Polygram Records, Inc. v. Legacy Entertainment Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Gracey v. MaddinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. State of Tennessee ex rel., Herbert S. Moncier v. Nancy S. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API