Legal Opinion

Baumann v. Chaska Building Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 23, 2001No. CX-00-1208PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge *

Appellants Harlan and Cheryl Baumann appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of respondent Chaska Building Center. The district court concluded that because the market value of appellants’ home exceeded $200,000, the homestead exemption protected only $200,000 of its market value. Appellants claim the homestead exemption applies to their equity in the property, not its market value. By notice of review, respondent challenges the portion of the summary judgment ruling that because appellants’ property is located outside a laid-out or platted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Wynkoop v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Owens v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of J.R.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Kipp v. SwenoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Running v. Dolan (In re Goodspeed)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  4. Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. OleanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API