Legal Opinion
Kipp v. Sweno
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 19, 2001No. C3-01-55PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge
In postjudgment proceedings, appellants sought to enforce a judgment obtained against respondent by levying on property owned by respondent and his wife. Respondent claimed the homestead exemption precluded a forced sale of the subject property. The district court agreed. On appeal, appellants allege the district court erred in (a) not ordering that portion of respondent’s property exceeding the value of the homestead exemption to be severed from the interest of respondent and his wife and sold under MinmStat. § 550.175, subd. 4 (2000) to satisfy appellants’ judgment; and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Ann H. O'Hagan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- First Trust Co. v. Union Depot Place Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kipp v. SwenoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Ramette v. United States (In Re Bame)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- In Re EngstromUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Gibson v. Trustees of the Minnesota State Basic Building Trades Fringe Benefits FundsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Kipp v. SwenoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004