In re the Welfare of J.R.B.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.*
The district court denied a prior petition to terminate appellants’ parental rights, and respondent Rice County later filed a second petition for similar relief. After a trial on the second petition, the district court terminated parental rights based on determinations under four statutory bases for this remedy. Both parents appealed, and this court consolidated the appeals.
*898The district court’s findings of the underlying facts address the statutory factors relevant to the bases for terminating parental rights that were invoked by the district court; those findings are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Rehn v. FischleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.E.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re G. J. Parents F.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- In re Welfare of K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.